Author |
Message |
Uillean
New member Username: Uillean
Post Number: 8 Registered: 12-2006
| Posted on Thursday, December 14, 2006 - 10:40 am: |
|
This isn't a question for the Tech, but this is where most of the antenna discussion is happening, so: How many here are using quad antennas? Did you settle on vertical or horizontal, and why? I recently built a 2 element quad, have been happy with it so far, VSWR is less than 1.2:1 across the 40 channels-- with no tuning, using a 1/4 wave matching section. What are your general impressions of your quad? thanks, Uillean |
Revpo
Intermediate Member Username: Revpo
Post Number: 106 Registered: 7-2006
| Posted on Thursday, December 14, 2006 - 10:48 pm: |
|
Where did you get the info on building the quad..materials etc.. revpo CEF 795/doctor |
Bruce
Senior Member Username: Bruce
Post Number: 4233 Registered: 9-2003
| Posted on Friday, December 15, 2006 - 10:04 am: |
|
Quads are good antennas and have about 2 db more gain than a beam. The quad was invented by the enginers at HCJB RADIO and is widely used by hams today |
Uillean
Junior Member Username: Uillean
Post Number: 10 Registered: 12-2006
| Posted on Friday, December 15, 2006 - 10:28 am: |
|
Revpo, I'd been kicking this idea around for years, but the Cubical Quad book by William Orr and Stuart Cowan is probably the best source-- and I bought it used off Ebay for about 7 bucks. They don't have dimensions specifically for 11m, but all the standard formulas are there, so calculating them is no big deal. I got all the materials (except for the wire) from Lowes-- used 3/4" x 3/4" angle aluminum for the hubs, ripped straight-grained 1x4s into 3/4" square strips for the spreaders. Used 2x2s for the boom and mast into the rotor. Ended up having to order the wire-- the days of walking into Radio Shack and getting actual radio stuff are over, I'm afraid. The wood ends up being only slighty heavier than a similar antenna I built years ago using sch 40 PVC for the spreaders, but is much more rigid. I settled on a 5' 6" boom to give a good match to the 1/4 wave 75 ohm matching section, but you could space the elements around 3 1/2 feet and have a good match to 50 ohms if you wanted. You could also make a wire gamma match and use a short length of coax as a gamma capacitor, but the matching section doesn't require any adjustments, so I went that route. There are several good sources on the web, W4RNL's site may be overload, but it's good stuff. I've seen Signal Engineering's website mentioned on this board- very well done, but has some inaccuirate info (gain figures are wrong, f/b ratios, etc.). But I have maybe $40 total in this antenna, including the flat black paint. May write an article about it for the Copper Forum if there's any interest. |
|