| Author |
Message |
    
Taz
| | Posted on Monday, December 17, 2001 - 11:08 pm: | 
|
Which radio would operate better performance wise? |
Honkytonkman593
| | Posted on Tuesday, December 18, 2001 - 9:09 pm: |
|
melaka as a base unit is an excellent choice for a non technical radio. delta force is to me a little easier to break. for example turn the channel knob on a galaxy base or melaka and youll feel a quality knob a little still falls into place nice, as a magnum might skip channels when you turn it cause the teethon the knob are closer and it feels cheap when you turn it. easier to work on a melaka then a magnum. only downfall of melaka is no frequency counter. but theres always an add on one to buy!! hey good luck . |
Taz
| | Posted on Tuesday, December 18, 2001 - 9:54 pm: |
|
Thanks,
A friend of mine dosent like galaxy and he says that he sees alot go in the shop because of cracked boards and he thinks the delta force is better. uhhh. I dont really see how unless u want more channels. and I think the magnum is a nice radio but I dont want one and I think they are cheap too. \
I just wanted an opinion, thanks honkytonkman593 |
Honkytonkman593
| | Posted on Wednesday, December 19, 2001 - 6:29 pm: |
|
hey no problem just remember galaxys are easier to work if there is ever a problem, on then a surface mount technology of the magnum . most "techs" would rather work on a galaxy then computer controled radios. oh technically the melaka isnt a galaxy but it is the same technology as it even though it says it. youll like it i like mine. good luck. |
Taz
| | Posted on Wednesday, December 19, 2001 - 10:04 pm: |
|
thanks
taz-411 phoenix arizona |
Jpatt24
| | Posted on Tuesday, December 25, 2001 - 6:41 pm: |
|
can anyone tell me exactly who makes the melaka and what is the difference ?? |
|
