Copper Talk » Ask The Tech » Antennas » Directional cb antenna « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Flying_cloud
Junior Member
Username: Flying_cloud

Post Number: 14
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Sunday, May 03, 2009 - 10:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

hay yall.
I would like to get another cb base antenna I currently have an antron A-99. I would like to get the best bang for my buck.what type would be best??? I was thinking about a 3 element beam.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bruce
Senior Member
Username: Bruce

Post Number: 5039
Registered: 9-2003


Posted on Monday, May 04, 2009 - 8:49 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

3 to 4 elm beam is best for the buck ...
On 6 since 66
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ssr
New member
Username: Ssr

Post Number: 9
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Monday, May 04, 2009 - 9:02 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

i will let the actual experts give recomandations, however i would suggest you add a couple things,
i assume you are keeping the a99 and adding another, what is the purpose of the new ant? are you looking to shoot skip, get farther out locally? are there space/height restrictions?
are you replaceing the a99?
whats the budget?
theres alot to consider in ant selection, the more info the better to make a good recommendation.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bruce
Senior Member
Username: Bruce

Post Number: 5040
Registered: 9-2003


Posted on Monday, May 04, 2009 - 9:27 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

GAIN on a 3 elm beam is about 6 DBD on a 9 foot boom ..... Gain on a 4 elm beam is about 7DBD on a 14 foot boom....

NOW if you want to go up 1/2 "S" unit you have to go to a 28 foot boom and 6-7 elms.

THEN you have to figure how your going to turn it ... small beams turn with a TV rotor larger ones take a HAM M ( $400 to 800 ) and a good size tower to support it.

Dr.YAGI and DR. UDA 70 years ago figured this out and even with computer added design no one has done much better.

For 40 years I have ran 3 and 4 elm beams on 6 and 2 meters with very good results ....

Now you CAN make a directional antenna out of 2 A-99's but at best its tricky ....

http://www.hy-gain.com/man/pdf/AV-12AVQ.pdf

This manual about page 20 shows how to phaes 2 antennas again its not just runing a coax ....

Look around and see what is out there and

FEEL FREE TO ASK QUESTIONS !

Bruce
On 6 since 66
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tech237
Moderator
Username: Tech237

Post Number: 1155
Registered: 4-2004


Posted on Monday, May 04, 2009 - 11:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Beams are good, but may have forgotten something, and that is a 3 el Quad has slightly more gain than a 3 el beam on the same boom length.

Admittedly beams for CB are available commercially, and I am not too sure about Quads (all mine have been homebrewed).

If you really want experiment a bit, and have some free space, you could always try things like colinear arrays or curtains, which can be built for less than a beam and can have the same gain only in fixed directions though.
Simon
Tech237
N7AUS
.
I thought he said, "there was no rust for the wicked, and I own an MGB"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Olde_timer_669
Junior Member
Username: Olde_timer_669

Post Number: 43
Registered: 8-2007


Posted on Monday, May 04, 2009 - 6:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

If you are thinking about a Yagi Beam, Considering size & gain I would think 4 elements
Ron
Olde Timer 669
CEF 940/Ham 264
Quincy Illinois
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Flying_cloud
Junior Member
Username: Flying_cloud

Post Number: 15
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Monday, May 04, 2009 - 7:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

thanks I am still new to directional antennas.
is vertical mounting better than horizontal????
I hate to seem like a dummy but can you explain co phasing two cb antennas better please. from my understanding you need equil lengths of coax to the antennas and thats about it sry
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Flying_cloud
Junior Member
Username: Flying_cloud

Post Number: 16
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Monday, May 04, 2009 - 7:15 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I was thinking about a maco m103-c but not sure about the best antenna to get I wanted one that would give me at least times 20 multiplication so I can do better on long range talking.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Starface
Senior Member
Username: Starface

Post Number: 2426
Registered: 1-2005
Posted on Monday, May 04, 2009 - 8:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Local Vertical
DX Vorizontal
George
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Moderator136
Moderator
Username: Moderator136

Post Number: 1471
Registered: 4-2005
Posted on Monday, May 04, 2009 - 9:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hi Flying_cloud
I have owned a Maco 103 in the past and at this time a Maco 105 in the air. The Maco 103 you can use a tv rotor and they work great and Copper sell's them also. As said in a above post you have to have a bigger rotor and are not cheap, My 5 element beam has cde rotor with brake. To put it simple: Vertical to vertical.. Horizontal to horizontal. I have less noise on horizontal beam than the vertical Imax 2000. Now about your question on gain the Maco 103 around 9 or 10 . Around 6 db. My 105 gain around 14 db - 28 foot boom and so called power gain 40 times the output. I hope im right in given you the answers im doing by memory and math in my head. Also depends on coax loss and switches , tuners , amps and a whole bunch of factors. I hope i helped in some way.
73
Hal~Moderator136~KCØSVC
CEF#0136/CEF HAM#23 ~ CVC#0004
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Flying_cloud
Junior Member
Username: Flying_cloud

Post Number: 17
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Monday, May 04, 2009 - 9:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

so I should mount it horizontal for dx and it will have less noise. and with a maco m103-c I can use a tv rotor but any thing bigger I will have to get a bigger rotor.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dale
Senior Member
Username: Dale

Post Number: 1482
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Tuesday, May 05, 2009 - 10:10 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

yes get the 103 mount it horizonally then get
a imax2k or maco5/8,sirio2016 for a verticle
and mount it above it.talking locally with beams
to me seems more trouble than its worth constancly turning beams and people hollaring
for ya and cant hear them cause beams arent pointed right direction.not to mention the extra
wear and tear on a rotar turning the beam every
5-10 minutes.just use/get a ground for verticle/local use.just my 2 cents worth
dale/a.k.a.hotrod
cef426
cvc#64
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Starface
Senior Member
Username: Starface

Post Number: 2428
Registered: 1-2005
Posted on Tuesday, May 05, 2009 - 11:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Dale I agree, get the 103 mount it horizonally then get
a imax2k or maco5/8,sirio2016 for a verticle.
George
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Flying_cloud
Junior Member
Username: Flying_cloud

Post Number: 20
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 1:58 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

instead fo that could I use the antron a99 for local and use the beam for dx just co phase them or would that not work??
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Moderator136
Moderator
Username: Moderator136

Post Number: 1474
Registered: 4-2005
Posted on Tuesday, May 05, 2009 - 9:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hi again Flying _ Cloud
Yes again the Maco 103 will do what you want it to do. And a light rotor from Copper will work fine also.
Hal~Moderator136~KCØSVC
CEF#0136/CEF HAM#23 ~ CVC#0004
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Airplane1
Senior Member
Username: Airplane1

Post Number: 1211
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 9:17 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Keep your 99 and mount it above the 103c mounted horizontal and use a tv rotor. you can get them from copper and you will have a great local/DX setup.

Oh yea, try to get the beam 36 ft to boom if you can.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Big_m
Member
Username: Big_m

Post Number: 67
Registered: 9-2007
Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 9:11 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Flying Cloud yes you can use your A99 above the Maco 103. Just mount the A99 about 2-3 feet above the Maco. And it will work great.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Flying_cloud
Junior Member
Username: Flying_cloud

Post Number: 21
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 3:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

ok thanks yall sorry for the trouble like i said earlier i am still learning on the raido stuff thanks
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dale
Senior Member
Username: Dale

Post Number: 1483
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 10:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

sorry cloud didnt see ya already had an a-99
yes it will work.i got many locals here that
use this exact type of setup
dale/a.k.a.hotrod
cef426
cvc#64
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Flying_cloud
Junior Member
Username: Flying_cloud

Post Number: 22
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Thursday, May 07, 2009 - 9:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

airplane what do you mean when you say to get the beam 36 ft to boom if you can?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bruce
Senior Member
Username: Bruce

Post Number: 5051
Registered: 9-2003


Posted on Friday, May 08, 2009 - 5:59 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Above the ground some antennas can be effected by how high up they are
On 6 since 66
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Flying_cloud
Junior Member
Username: Flying_cloud

Post Number: 23
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Friday, May 08, 2009 - 9:28 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

thanks bruce so i should mount it 36' in the air at least
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Airplane1
Senior Member
Username: Airplane1

Post Number: 1213
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Monday, May 11, 2009 - 7:17 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Flying cloud,

Most people say to get the antenna up at least a wave length, 36 ft from ground to where your beam antenna connects to the mast. It helps the take off angle to be lower which helps you get out better than if you mount it lower and shoot your signal up in the sky at a higher angle. I had my antenna at 7 ft on a temp. mount just to get on the air fast. When I got it up on the tower 36 ft I did much much better ground wave and DX. it is like skiping a stone on water, if you throw the stone on a lower angle at the water the stone skips farther. This is what I learned on here.

This is why I say to get at least 36 ft.

Hope this helps.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Flying_cloud
Junior Member
Username: Flying_cloud

Post Number: 25
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 - 3:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

thanks airplane
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Keithinatlanta
Advanced Member
Username: Keithinatlanta

Post Number: 831
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 7:08 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Ok guys, now you can educate me. What if the beam is mounted on a 50' push up pole? Does that help to be higher or is 36' the magic number? Thanks.

Keith in Atlanta
CEF 150
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tech237
Moderator
Username: Tech237

Post Number: 1159
Registered: 4-2004


Posted on Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 12:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Keith - it is a trade off. More height gives you better line of sight capability and thus increasews your "local" contact range (usually more observable at higher frequencies).

Conversely certain heights (and usually measured in wavelengths or parts of) will lower the angle of radiation, which in turns helps in gaining long distance contacts. One wavelength (or around 36ft at CB frequencies) is usually pretty good for working those elusive DX stations.
Simon
Tech237
N7AUS
.
I thought he said, "there was no rust for the wicked, and I own an MGB"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Airplane1
Senior Member
Username: Airplane1

Post Number: 1215
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Friday, May 15, 2009 - 7:16 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Interresting Tech237, I knew 1 wave length 34ft at cb freq. as a starting point but I thought the higher the better from there. Wont the angle of radiation keep dropping as you keep going up even if not at every wave length?

AP
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tech237
Moderator
Username: Tech237

Post Number: 1160
Registered: 4-2004


Posted on Friday, May 15, 2009 - 11:45 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Airplane - nope. You get to a point where your height above RF ground (may not be the same as physical ground) is such that the angle starts to increase again.

Every full wavelength the radiation angle will drop to as low as it will go, so going multiples of a wavelength doesn't really help any for DX (and that's what you're working on by dropping that angle), and you'll get extra loss from the longer run of coax. Again the extra height will increase you "local" contact range, which can be worked out by d= 1.415 x sqr root of height. I will admit that this is more noticable at VHF than CB, but does still have an effect on 27MHz.

Like most things in this game, antenna height is a trade off.
Simon
Tech237
N7AUS
.
I thought he said, "there was no rust for the wicked, and I own an MGB"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Flying_cloud
Junior Member
Username: Flying_cloud

Post Number: 26
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Friday, May 15, 2009 - 2:48 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Tech237

Can you explain the math formula.
D = 1.415 x sqr root of height.
I done this problem at the 36' mark and d is 8.49
What does D stand for??????
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tech237
Moderator
Username: Tech237

Post Number: 1162
Registered: 4-2004


Posted on Friday, May 15, 2009 - 9:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

sorry d= is distance in miles to the radio horizon or line of sight.

If you do it for a mast of 18ft your line of sight distance is 6 miles, and for 72ft it becomes 12 miles. Not a great gain for doubling the antenna heightfrom 36ft.
Simon
Tech237
N7AUS
.
I thought he said, "there was no rust for the wicked, and I own an MGB"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Flying_cloud
Junior Member
Username: Flying_cloud

Post Number: 27
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Friday, May 15, 2009 - 10:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

thanks tech237
I did not know that I learn somthing every day lol!

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: