| Author |
Message |
    
Capt_hook
Intermediate Member
Username: Capt_hook
Post Number: 208
Registered: 6-2004
| | Posted on Monday, January 16, 2006 - 12:06 pm: | 
|
?????????what is the diff.....Capt Hook |
Gage
Intermediate Member
Username: Gage
Post Number: 208
Registered: 7-2003
| | Posted on Monday, January 16, 2006 - 5:50 pm: |
|
Capt Hook
DID not know there was a old and new I-MAX2000?The I-Max 2000 on the tower is 4 years old and the one on top of the shop is almost 1 year old and they both look the same.Maybe Solarcon came out with a new version?
Gage!!CEF-114 |
Moonraker
Intermediate Member
Username: Moonraker
Post Number: 132
Registered: 3-2005
| | Posted on Monday, January 16, 2006 - 9:14 pm: |
|
I think the older version didn't have the mounting flange and mounted to the mast like an A99. I wont swear by that, but I think its right.  |
Tech833
Moderator
Username: Tech833
Post Number: 1156
Registered: 8-2002
| | Posted on Monday, January 16, 2006 - 9:39 pm: |
|
Moonraker wins the prize. Electrically, they are the same. |
Timblazer2
New member
Username: Timblazer2
Post Number: 6
Registered: 12-2005
| | Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2006 - 11:41 pm: |
|
what makes the difference with the mounting? i think i like how the a-99 mounts better |
Sitm
Intermediate Member
Username: Sitm
Post Number: 196
Registered: 1-2004
| | Posted on Friday, February 10, 2006 - 12:53 pm: |
|
Personally, I find that the mounting on the side of the Imax to be more comforting. My Imax is mounted at nearly 70 feet at the bottom of the tower and I get winds that nearly lay it horizonal. I would imagine that the wind load on the base of the bracket is enormous and the flang takes that load alot better than the bottom of the antenna would. JMO
73 |
