Author |
Message |
Daveb404
| Posted on Monday, April 01, 2002 - 1:11 pm: |
|
Hey Copper, why do you not have a Quad antenna series for sale. They clearly leave the vericals in the dust if you can and have room for a small beam plus setup. |
Forummaster
| Posted on Monday, April 01, 2002 - 1:24 pm: |
|
We carry the Maco VQuad and YQuad. |
jyd
| Posted on Wednesday, April 17, 2002 - 10:03 am: |
|
i might try a v quad |
jyd
| Posted on Friday, July 05, 2002 - 6:44 pm: |
|
the v-quad is a real quad antenna but the y-quad is not. |
bruce
| Posted on Saturday, July 06, 2002 - 12:10 am: |
|
jyd back in the late 70's i built out of tubing a 2 elm V quad cut to 50.2 Mhz... killer antenna as much gain as a 3 elm beam. If i had the room id be running one on 17 meters now .... but you know the story the wife thinks antennas are ugly.... and when the wife is not happy ..... well you know. |
Twa77
| Posted on Monday, January 20, 2003 - 5:16 pm: |
|
how does the v-quad compare in performance to a pdl 2 or a superhawk? |
mikefromms
| Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 6:53 pm: |
|
That's a good question. The V-Quad claims to have as much gain as a three element beam. I like the fact they send and recieve both polarity signals. mikefromms |
Znut
| Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 8:10 pm: |
|
I made one! It works great. |
Bullet
| Posted on Saturday, August 09, 2003 - 9:19 pm: |
|
twa77, that is a good question! given element spacing and lengths are equal for both beams as well as boom length. and being those quad loops have the following a square "loop" has .86dbd a delta "loop" has .55dbd the cubicals will have slightly higher gain of the two. |