Copper Talk » Product Reviews » Antennas » What would be the "Magic" height ? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Keithinatlanta
Advanced Member
Username: Keithinatlanta

Post Number: 835
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Thursday, June 18, 2009 - 7:43 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What would be magic height to mount my new super scanner? I have a fifty foot push up pole. Same question if I use the Super mag instead. Thanks.

Keith in Atlanta
CEF 150
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tech808
Moderator
Username: Tech808

Post Number: 16924
Registered: 8-2002


Posted on Thursday, June 18, 2009 - 8:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

36' / 54' / 72' will give you FULL Wave.

Hope this help's,
Lon~Tech808
N9CEF~EN50mk
CEF#0808~CVC#0002


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tech833
Moderator
Username: Tech833

Post Number: 1713
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 - 8:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Any 1/2 wave multiple. Measure from the ground to the horizontal spreaders.

1/2 wave at 27 MHz. is about 17.5 feet.

No matter what, the higher the better.

Also keep in mind, the FCC rules limit antenna height to either-

60 feet (to top) above ground
OR
20 feet above the structire the antenna is mounted upon, like a building. 'Structure' does not unclude a communications type tower.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Keithinatlanta
Advanced Member
Username: Keithinatlanta

Post Number: 841
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Thursday, August 13, 2009 - 8:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thanks guys. Sorry for the delay. Business travel has kept me from doing anything except when talking on radio in car. Just no time anymore it seems like. Recession continues to take it's toll.

Keith in Atlanta
CEF 150
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Crown59
New member
Username: Crown59

Post Number: 2
Registered: 2-2004
Posted on Monday, August 17, 2009 - 12:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I agree with the earlier postings... The higher you can get it the better... Its all about takoff angle for that long distance stuff and for good ground wave it needs to be up there!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kf4gyp
Junior Member
Username: Kf4gyp

Post Number: 16
Registered: 11-2009


Posted on Friday, February 05, 2010 - 1:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hello keith

Tech833 is right on the money with the rules but you can go up to 199 feet on a monitoring antenna but after that you will have to light,paint and register the tower with the FCC and the FAA. This really a good thing to search for on the FCC ULS site. My workman w-5/8 is a monitoring/ham antenna
@ 90 feet(Nod)(smile)!!
73 Ray/Hawk-Eye
DE KF4GYP
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mikefromms
Senior Member
Username: Mikefromms

Post Number: 1049
Registered: 6-2003
Posted on Tuesday, August 24, 2010 - 5:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Wow, I wish someone would manufactor that antenna again. One day I am moving to a place where I can put up some big antennas. That was m favorite beam type antenna. Yes, the higher the better for local but for skip I don't know if you would improve much more over 17 feet or a halfwave. Just don't know.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: