Copper Talk » Open Forum » Archived Messages » 2004 » 11/01/2004 to 11/30/2004 » Davemade vs. x-force « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wrk3
Junior Member
Username: Wrk3

Post Number: 35
Registered: 4-2004
Posted on Monday, November 22, 2004 - 1:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

for a 2 pill base , with 2290's, what do most of u guys recommend???
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Highlander
Advanced Member
Username: Highlander

Post Number: 688
Registered: 12-2001
Posted on Monday, November 22, 2004 - 6:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Neither, if you want to run SSB.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mdiver
Intermediate Member
Username: Mdiver

Post Number: 186
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Monday, November 22, 2004 - 7:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

YEP--- Side ban a must-at least for the Net
CEF-252
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

oklahobo (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - 10:38 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

say hey, the mega force has ssb!! about the same amps as the other two, but with b bias.. use a 1x4 myself and cant complain as its doing close to 900 in the mobil, either ssb, or am.. on my meters in my car!! just some opther amp to help you out in looking..

thehobo
274150 am
monitor ch.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Highlander
Advanced Member
Username: Highlander

Post Number: 690
Registered: 12-2001
Posted on Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - 12:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I've heard some of the class B boxes on SSB before--they sound OK, but not great. Put one on a spec analyzer and I'll bet it isn't pretty.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gumball
Junior Member
Username: Gumball

Post Number: 25
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - 5:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Wrk3:

What radio?
If you are looking for a Class B amp (with 2 of 2290's) that will do AM and SSB, look at the Magna-Force 200.
If no SSB, look at the X-Force X80.
X-Force and Magna-Force are same mfg.

I have used a few X-Force amps before - very good quality.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Allagator
Advanced Member
Username: Allagator

Post Number: 514
Registered: 9-2002


Posted on Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - 8:09 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

KLV1000 would be cheeper and will run on SSB and 10 and 12 meter !!
and it even has a ajustable preamp !!

but its my 2 cent !!

Allagator !!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wolverine
Intermediate Member
Username: Wolverine

Post Number: 257
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Wednesday, November 24, 2004 - 3:29 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I agree with Gumball. An AB biased magnaforce 200 works fine for sideband. In my opinion, all Xforce/magnaforce custom built amps being "Hand built", are a step above all other 2 or 4 pill configured (splatter boxes) amps. Another good bet, would be a Texas star 500(4x SC2849 pills), that is if you want a tradional manufactured version. I believe that most folks prefer using "Tubes" for base station SSB applications, because of the richer sound that tubes will provide, and they seem to bleed less (TVI) than transistor amps. If that's the case, then KLV amps would be the way to go. Besides they are cheaper. Quality wise I'll let someone else comment on the KLV base amps. Bottom line, Xforce and magna force amps are custom built to transmit all of your power, on the desired frequency on 11- meter 40 channel radios, whereas other amps will waste, bleed, transmit power on more than 1 channel (Harmonics). Hope this helps.
Wolverine.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Highlander
Advanced Member
Username: Highlander

Post Number: 693
Registered: 12-2001
Posted on Wednesday, November 24, 2004 - 6:45 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Trouble is, there is no AB biased Magna Force. They are class B. Class AB is cleaner than class B on SSB. The opposite of your last statement is true in this case, if you compare a class AB KLV to a class B Magna or X-force, the KLV is the cleaner of the two. The B boxes are the ones that are going to produce more harmonics and IMD garbage, not the KLV.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wolverine
Intermediate Member
Username: Wolverine

Post Number: 258
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Wednesday, November 24, 2004 - 7:36 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thanks for catching my typo Highlander. I meant B biased magnaforce 200. The AB biased KLV will be cleaner than a typical B box, but Wrk3 appears to be interested in transistors, as opposed to tubes, namely the X or Magnaforce base amps. If he "Wants" cleaner for SSB use, and likes tubes, then KLV would be the way to go.
Wolverine.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

DX'r (Unregistered Guest)
Unregistered guest
Posted on Thursday, November 25, 2004 - 10:17 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The only problem is, eventually a person will start having trouble locating tubes for these things. All the new SMT technology plus all the new tech that comes along, tubes are pretty much going the way of the 8-track now. I can't even find a tube in my area. Then what do you do?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wolverine
Intermediate Member
Username: Wolverine

Post Number: 260
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Friday, November 26, 2004 - 6:42 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well, I would'nt give up so easily. I'd do research and call companies like KLV, RF Parts, TC Electronics, Kenwood, Eimac Tubes, Svetlana tubes, etc. I know the story that sweep tubes are a vanishing species, even with the new technology all around us. But, I believe that amp manufacturers that produce these amps will have the stock to replace them, like KLV. You can even still find tubes for the old "Browning Eagles"(Maybe from E-bay, or The Browning Laboratories, collectors, etc.), but you may pay a premium for them, to make sure that you are not purchasing tubes that are "Flat". Hope this helps.
Wolverine.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Highlander
Advanced Member
Username: Highlander

Post Number: 695
Registered: 12-2001
Posted on Friday, November 26, 2004 - 11:38 am:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Real ceramic transmitting tubes will be around for a long time.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lordnull
New member
Username: Lordnull

Post Number: 1
Registered: 9-2008
Posted on Friday, September 05, 2008 - 1:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Don't forget that there are audiophiles willing to pay for brand new hi-end amps that are tube amps, and of course professional music guitar amps such as Fender, Marshall and others that will keep tubes a viable alternative to solid state hardware -- granted that the tubes used in guitar amps are not rf tubes.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: