| Author |
Message |
    
Blownsmoke
| | Posted on Saturday, May 10, 2003 - 10:37 am: | 
|
I asked the tech point of view, now i am curious of what everybody else thinks of these two radios. What radio is better, or in this case is there a better radio than these. Looking for clean modulation, very clear, very loud, and good ssb operation. |
Highlander
| | Posted on Saturday, May 10, 2003 - 11:44 am: |
|
The Ranger 6900 25 probably has better stability on SSB than the Galaxy. |
Mrhappy
| | Posted on Saturday, May 10, 2003 - 1:38 pm: |
|
Galaxy is overrated,overpriced to say the least,go with the ranger. |
Bman02
| | Posted on Saturday, May 10, 2003 - 2:55 pm: |
|
Never owned a 6900 but i do have a 99v.Its really loud and clear on am but is horrible for sideband-drifts all over the place. |
Tech671
| | Posted on Sunday, May 11, 2003 - 12:35 am: |
|
Tip: Galaxy drifts no more than the 6900. |
CM 3885
| | Posted on Monday, May 12, 2003 - 1:56 am: |
|
Hmmm i had a galaxy 88 HL that i used on SSB and after about 15 minutes of warmup it was fairly stable. I also had a galaxy saturn that i got from a local guy NIB for 325.00 and it was solid as a rock on AM and SSB(after the usual 15 minute warmup) because it was new and never jockeyed with on the insides... |
Blownsmoke
| | Posted on Monday, May 12, 2003 - 10:11 pm: |
|
I heard or read somewhere cant remember, but you cannot get the Ranger radios to open up "if you will", like you can a Galaxy!!!...... Any ideas anybody? |
Mrsandman
| | Posted on Tuesday, May 13, 2003 - 8:12 am: |
|
99 is great on am not on ssb
the ranger is great on both but the 99 does not
have the hash noise on rx like ranger
think about what mode u talk the most
am or ssb and go for there |
|
