| Author |
Message |
    
APPLE
| | Posted on Tuesday, October 08, 2002 - 5:16 pm: | 
|
WHICH ONE ONE IS THE BEST FAR AS PREFORMANCE? |
Tech808
| | Posted on Tuesday, October 08, 2002 - 6:33 pm: |
|
APPLE,
As for OLD Tube Type compaired to NEW go with the NEW for sure.
I feel you would be much happier with any of the newer Amps. They take less space, Most have good Pre-amps in them. And are very dependable.
Check out the KL amps that COPPER has listed and I am sure you can find one you like and one that will fit your needs at a resonable price.
And please check out / read the reviews under the Subscriber section here in the Forum.
Steve Tech 181 has done a great Review on the KL-40 and the KL-300.
Just my thoughts!
Lon
tech808 |
bruce
| | Posted on Tuesday, October 08, 2002 - 6:38 pm: |
|
as far as real world copper sells good ones you dont hear much griping about them if i was a cber wanting a highpower amp i would get a ham amp ...... just my opinion |
2600
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 09, 2002 - 12:38 am: |
|
Uh, as far as MOBILE power is concerned, tubes are at a real disadvantage. Tubes in the mobile tend to be power hogs. You will get more RF power per watt of VEHICLE power with transistors. It's that simple.
73 |
bruce
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 09, 2002 - 4:46 am: |
|
2600 you meen it takes power to heat filiments intresting idea but your right there is no logical reason to use tubes in a 200 watt amp. |
Apple
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 09, 2002 - 7:53 am: |
|
thanks, for the help, Tim Apple |
|
