Author |
Message |
Admin
Board Administrator Username: Admin
Post Number: 56 Registered: 2-2004
| Posted on Thursday, January 22, 2015 - 6:08 pm: |
|
If price didn't matter which of these two radios would you choose? ------------------------------------------------ AT-5555 ------------------------------------------------ AT-6666
|
Charliebrown
Intermediate Member Username: Charliebrown
Post Number: 424 Registered: 10-2002
| Posted on Friday, January 23, 2015 - 12:45 pm: |
|
I like the AT 6666. |
Scrapiron63
Advanced Member Username: Scrapiron63
Post Number: 941 Registered: 12-2001
| Posted on Friday, January 23, 2015 - 1:45 pm: |
|
For my use which would be in a vehicle, I would choose the one on top, the AT-5555. Radios with features like the one on bottom are very hard to operate in a mobile, unless you stay on the same channel, mode, etc all time. |
Tech237
Moderator Username: Tech237
Post Number: 1833 Registered: 4-2004
| Posted on Saturday, January 24, 2015 - 9:10 am: |
|
The second one, and I volunteer to test and review it.. Tech237 N7AUS God made me an athiest, who are you to question his wisdom?
|
Dale
Senior Member Username: Dale
Post Number: 2164 Registered: 12-2002
| Posted on Saturday, January 24, 2015 - 5:08 pm: |
|
well that depends with me 1st one for sure if its going in a mobile much larger knobs display looks better 2nd one - if its a base setup .appears to have a vfo knob that be nice for a base station .but a pain in the mobile to easy to get off channel if slightly bumped.just my 2 cents worth dale/a.k.a.hotrod cef426 cvc#64 454 [dx numbers] 38lsb
|
Charliebrown
Intermediate Member Username: Charliebrown
Post Number: 427 Registered: 10-2002
| Posted on Monday, January 26, 2015 - 9:03 am: |
|
The at5555 look's like the TOP GUN QUAD-5 Radio |
N8fgb
Intermediate Member Username: N8fgb
Post Number: 117 Registered: 5-2002
| Posted on Monday, January 26, 2015 - 9:06 am: |
|
I would go with the first one. !0hz steps, and 7 digit frequency display. Rich |
Charliebrown
Intermediate Member Username: Charliebrown
Post Number: 428 Registered: 10-2002
| Posted on Monday, January 26, 2015 - 1:28 pm: |
|
The at 5555 also look's like the Alpha 10 am 1000. Also according to CB trick's the mod's are the same |
Dale
Senior Member Username: Dale
Post Number: 2166 Registered: 12-2002
| Posted on Monday, January 26, 2015 - 7:31 pm: |
|
i would like to see coppers carry these new radios. theres alot of them out there dale/a.k.a.hotrod cef426 cvc#64 454 [dx numbers] 38lsb
|
Charliebrown
Intermediate Member Username: Charliebrown
Post Number: 429 Registered: 10-2002
| Posted on Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - 12:21 pm: |
|
Hello Dale, I would like for them to do so also. I think both of these radio's are good but my pick is still the RCI DX radio's. |
Dale
Senior Member Username: Dale
Post Number: 2168 Registered: 12-2002
| Posted on Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - 8:06 pm: |
|
the rci line is good radio. but there reciever section is a bit noisy imho. why id like to see more options here dale/a.k.a.hotrod cef426 cvc#64 454 [dx numbers] 38lsb
|
Revpo
Advanced Member Username: Revpo
Post Number: 744 Registered: 7-2006
| Posted on Friday, January 30, 2015 - 6:59 pm: |
|
For the price of the q-5 nearly $300, you can purchase a used ALINCO or ICOM and have all bands plus 100 watts, unless you just want a signal band radio... CEF 795/28.400 DAILY 73 REVPO/DOCTOR/CEF 795 Wavin a hand from the cornfields of INDIANA
|
Charliebrown
Intermediate Member Username: Charliebrown
Post Number: 434 Registered: 10-2002
| Posted on Saturday, February 07, 2015 - 1:48 am: |
|
Go to cbradiomagazine.com for the review of the alpha am 1000. The at 5555 look's just like this radio. You might get a surprise on this radio. |